web analytics

Reminders From The Quran

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.


Apache Server at iknowledge.islamicnature.com Port 80

Archive for March, 2012

Spring 2012 Maxis and What To Wear Over Them!

 

In Michigan we are experiencing amazingly warm weather! Today it was near 90 degrees, and in March this is very strange, the normal temperature would be in the 40s and 50s.  Although we are sure this isn’t going to last, and most probably the cold will return before the natural onset of warm spring and summer, we are enjoying this weather.  However, my wardrobe has been taken by surprize as I am scrambling to find hijab friendly cool outfits to wear.  This got me into looking at the beautiful maxis, which my consistent readers will know by now, I love.  Below I share some of the maxis I found, and then I also proceeded to look for possible light jackets/blazers that could be worn over them.  I focused on 5 major retailers, Nordstroms, Macys, Lord & Taylor, H&M, and Forever 21.  Enjoy!

 

_6663414

Nordstroms

_6745655

Nordstroms

_6753738

Nordstroms

_6782979

Nordstroms

_6806125

Nordstroms

_6823109

Nordstroms

_6836511

Nordstroms

_6845041

Nordstroms

_6846538

Nordstroms

_6868819

Nordstroms

_6870040

Nordstroms

_6892425

Nordstroms

1620dollars

This one costs $1620 dollars! Outrageous! Nordstroms

expensive but gorgeous

Gorgeous But Expensive! Nordstroms

nordstrom

Nordstroms

_6617569

Nordstroms

_6746112

Nordstroms

_6747062

Nordstroms

_6753482

Nordstroms

_6753537

Nordstroms

_6775945

Nordstroms

_6793597

Nordstroms

_6824827

Nordstroms

_6839214

Nordstroms

_6842090

Nordstroms

_6873222

Nordstroms

_6917201

Nordstroms

888621_fpx

MACY'S

1079870_fpx

MACY'S

1079874_fpx

MACY'S

1089057_fpx

MACY'S

1090584_fpx

MACY'S

1104724_fpx

MACY'S

1105210_fpx

MACY'S

1105212_fpx

MACY'S

1105465_fpx

MACY'S

1116471_fpx

MACY'S

1117055_fpx

MACY'S

1117731_fpx

MACY'S

1117745_fpx

MACY'S

1121809_fpx

MACY'S

1126129_fpx

MACY'S

1132799_fpx

MACY'S

1132801_fpx

MACY'S

1133893_fpx

MACY'S

1151469_fpx

MACY'S

999197_fpx

MACY'S

1000891_fpx

MACY'S

1008164_fpx

MACY'S

1088852_fpx

MACY'S

1092027_fpx

MACY'S

1102472_fpx

MACY'S

1107101_fpx

MACY'S

1113863_fpx

MACY'S

1122534_fpx

MACY'S

1126198_fpx

MACY'S

1133102_fpx

MACY'S

1152776_fpx

MACY'S

1159376_fpx

MACY'S

1167964_fpx

MACY'S

206977_2

Lord & Taylor

209368_2

Lord & Taylor

210231_2

Lord & Taylor

215530_2

Lord & Taylor

215916_2

Lord & Taylor

215976_2

Lord & Taylor

00038532-05

Forever 21

05756635-01

Forever 21

05758346-03

Forever 21

70221317-01

Forever 21

76942060-02

Forever 21

00036323-02

Forever 21

00036552-02

Forever 21

02928618-04

Forever 21

02930068-01

Forever 21

05757619-03

Forever 21

08585025-02

Forever 21

15035333-03

Forever 21

15036547-02

Forever 21

58636133-04

Forever 21

64787758-05

Forever 21

83315659-01

Forever 21

87533543-02

Forever 21

hmprodCA3P3MQ7

H&M

hmprodCA5JOV6P

H&M

hmprodCAINUQZ5

H&M

hmprodCAKCPYOG

H&M

hmprodCAMQPBT0

H&M

hmprodCARXBAYU

H&M

hmprodCAUQIV4V

H&M

untitled

H&M

untitled1

H&M

untitled4

H&M

untitled7

H&M

untitled8

H&M

untitled70

H&M

NordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsThis one costs $1620 dollars! Outrageous! NordstromsGorgeous But Expensive! NordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsNordstromsMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SMACY'SLord & TaylorLord & TaylorLord & TaylorLord & TaylorLord & TaylorLord & TaylorForever 21Forever 21Forever 21Forever 21Forever 21Forever 21Forever 21Forever 21Forever 21Forever 21Forever 21Forever 21Forever 21Forever 21Forever 21Forever 21Forever 21H&MH&MH&MH&MH&MH&MH&MH&MH&MH&MH&MH&MH&M

 

 

 

 

 

Share

Courtesy of Mediaite

Video

Former Rep. Robert Wexler explained that Israel and Palestine ought to negotiate directly and, so, if Palestine chooses instead to negotiate via the UN or any of its agencies, “we’re not going to fund the agencies,” as per the law. High five!

The thing is, though, that UNESCO holds a democratic vote to decide membership. But, no matter. We have the law on our nation’s side, starving African children, tsunami victims or our future relations with Iran and Afghanistan be darned. Plus, we have a message to send.

“And when you physically cut off your nose to spite your face,” Oliver noted, “that face is sending a message. And that message is ‘Don’t fuck with me!’” ‘Cause if I’m willing to do this to myself, what am I willing to do to you?” Submit you to segments about Assad’s affinity for the band LMFAO, FOR ONE!

RELATED: Maddow And Sen. James Inhofe Have Tense Exchange Over His Ties To Ugandan Anti-Gay Bill

So Oliver ventured to Gabon to confront these “tyrannical philanthropists” about their $2 million donation to UNESCO. He explained to a group of school children that, due to the law, they would now have to give back their UNESCO-funded books. But the children clung to them, selfishly and without any regard for the U.S.’s relationship to Israel. And no, we can’t change this law! Because we don’t want to! We didn’t create this problem! Just the law! Shut up!

We’re the good guys.

Check it out, via Comedy Central:

Share

Latest Bridal Hijab Styles From Around The World

 

bala-couture3
bridal-hijab6
bridalhijab-8
bridalhijab-11
Bridal-Hijab-Styles
desi wedding

Desi

egyptian color

Egyptian

egyptian wedding 1

Egyptian

egyptian wedding style

Egyptian

egyptian2

Egyptian

egyptian3

Egyptian

hijab_wedding_islamic_dress
hijab1
indonesian

Indonesian

kuwaiti

Kuwaiti

malaysian purple

Malaysian

malaysian wedding

Malaysian

malaysian2

Malaysian

malaysian3

Malaysian

pakistani hijab style

Pakistani hijab style

thumbnailCA3CBKSK
thumbnailCA3TMDV8
thumbnailCADUE6A0
thumbnailCAHWWPPT
thumbnailCATGEMM3
thumbnailCAYKX0LJ
turkish 3

Turkish

turkish wedding 2

Turkish

turkish wedding hijab style

Turkish

Wedding Hijab
Wedding Hijab Style 2011
Wedding Style Hijab 2011
Wedding Style Hijab 2011
bala-couture3bridal-hijab6bridalhijab-8bridalhijab-11Bridal-Hijab-StylesDesiEgyptianEgyptianEgyptianEgyptianEgyptianhijab_wedding_islamic_dresshijab1IndonesianKuwaitiMalaysianMalaysianMalaysianMalaysianPakistani hijab stylethumbnailCA3CBKSKthumbnailCA3TMDV8thumbnailCADUE6A0thumbnailCAHWWPPTthumbnailCATGEMM3thumbnailCAYKX0LJTurkishTurkishTurkishWedding HijabWedding Hijab Style 2011Wedding Style Hijab 2011Wedding Style Hijab 2011
Share

The Right Going The Wrong Way

As I enjoy following politics and think it’s very important to do so, I have spent this past two week listening to this debacle that a heartless individual, Rush Limbaugh, and the lost Republican Party candidates have created. As I was not paying much attention early on, and was picking up pieces here and there, I thought, “oh, here they go after abortion again”. Last week when I tuned in I found out, forget about abortion, they have moved on to contraception.
Although it is pretty obvious to me that this is all a scramble to find any point to raise against President Barack Obama, which is what has led the crude right crowd to flaunt this issue as an infringement on First Amendment rights in a manipulative manner, I still can’t help but address this incredulous matter. At first I was skeptical about the Democrats calling the unfolding events as a “War on Women”. I thought this was their spin on the situation, and while that may have been the case, I can’t help but feel as if they have a point. From my observation I found myself asking why are the vocal right, the family values party only addressing women about contraception when obviously it involves men too and yet the first panel they brought in to speak about the use of contraception included only men!
Why is Limbaugh attacking women and demonizing them when the very essence of the issue involves both men and women. And then this supposedly great upholder and voice of values wants to see the videos of the women! Are these the examples of good family values! Where do their family values go when they attack women for taking contraception, why do they not address men too! Or are they meaning to say that it should be the men who get to make the choice of whether women will get pregnant and to have the good sense to protect themselves. I mean if you take away the contraceptives and you listen to the argument of these right wing Republicans when they say that “they still have the choice of birth control” they are obviously talking about the kind that can be bought at a local drugstore, and we all know that involves men not women.
Above all how can these supposedly highly educated and intelligent leaders fail to recognize that millions of women take contraceptives not as a birth control, but for other medical disorders. So when they say that this is not a war on women rights, but rather a freedom of religion issue, why do they speak about contraceptives only as a birth control? The very point of bringing up this whole discussion seems to me to be actually the right and Republicans attacking not only women but freedom of religion.
President Obama had already exempted all religious entities from the requirement to provide free contraception through insurance plans; however the Republicans refused to back down their attack on President Obama, claiming he was ignoring the religious rights and freedoms of Americans and subsequently in an outrageous act attached the Blunt-Rubio amendment to the Highway Bill. This amendment would have allowed any employer to refuse to provide for any type of health care they believed was immoral. They were presumably planning on trying to pass an amendment which would give employees a great big loophole against the Universal Healthcare Reform Act signed by President Obama. What they managed to do was to kill an opportunity to create lots of jobs and instead led the country into this whole fiasco of a frivolous yet damaging argument. They continue to claim that the current law infringes upon the religious rights of people. How is that? Employers will be providing medical insurance, they don’t know what the employees’ medical needs are, and why should it matter to them. Furthermore, the freedom of religion and separation of church and state was meant not only to give every individual a right to follow whatever religion they choose but to also not give preference to the religion of any one group of individuals over others. If the Blunt-Rubio amendment had passed it would have enforced and given preference to the religious beliefs of employers. What about the employee’s religious beliefs.
When there is such a variation on beliefs, the public interest must be given greater weight. Otherwise why not allow Mormons to marry more than one person, because it is in accordance to their religious beliefs, or for those who follow the religion of Hinduism, who believe in a strict vegetarian diet, to say that they shouldn’t be forced to provide medicine which are made with animal gelatin or enzymes. In this case the point that contraception is not against all religious beliefs, moreover is an essential to millions of women for serious medical disorders and additionally the necessity to provide affordable health care are all overwhelmingly more important and compelling arguments against these hollow and in genuine claims by the Republicans. I can’t help but wonder why these baffling people are not able to recognize that all these issues are not only a women or men issue, black or white, religious or non-religious issue, but rather most importantly it’s a personal human medical private matters.
I’ve always been amazed at the hypocrisy that the right has engaged in. They portray their family and religious values as the essential aspect of their agenda, however we are constantly and continuously finding out about so many of their leaders being anything but good family people. They embrace and hold onto their Constitutional rights, as long as it is applied to themselves, but they then so easily turn their backs on those very dear rights when it would be applied to people who are different than them. The other major issue that they are always scaring people about is how the government shouldn’t have any control over our lives, again as long as they are able to maneuver matters according to their own fixed ideas and benefits. The hypocrisy just glares out to anyone who is paying attention, at least that’s how it would seem to me.
When I look to my faith, I find that Islam gives us the best guidance on this issue of contraception. As reported by Jabir, one of the eminent companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him), “We used to practice ‘azl (coitus interruption) while the Qur’an was being revealed; had it been forbidden to do so, the Qur’an certainly would have declared so.” (Bukahri)
And majority of scholars have deemed all forms of birth control to be permissible, as long as the method is not irreversible, and is temporary and by mutual consent of the both husband and wife.
Because although marriage is encouraged and recommended even at an early age, to provide husband and wife with companionship, it is recognized that the couple may not be ready to have children. Men and women prefer to have children when they can adequately care for them and raise them with full attention, which is a right of the children upon the parents, therefore in order to wait for an appropriate time when the couple can adequately and wholeheartedly care for their children, they are allowed to practice ‘azl’ or birth control. Furthermore, Islam doesn’t make this a woman or man issue, as it involves the agreement or decision of both. Once again Islam proves to make it easy for Muslims.

Share

A Must See!

In case you haven’t seen this yet, you must watch this.  This video has become the most popular video, and raises awareness about one of the most important issues we all needc to be aware of.

Please watch:

Share

Welcome to Muslimah Today!

Share

Share

Fashion and Sadaqah – N.M.N & Co

I just had to write this post today, because I just had to share the amazing and innovative mission and project that N.M.N & Co. have undertaken.

This is a group of people who are very passionate about The Children’s Cancer Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. They wanted to find a way to raise money to help the hospital and its great and most necessary service, therefore they cam up with this project in which they sell fashionable jewelry and watchs, and 100% of the money that is received from the purchases customers make is given to the hospital to assist the children who are suffering from cance but do not have the resources to pay for their treatment. MashAllah what an awesome project!   Furthermore, the jewelry they are selling are absolutely beautiful!  These people should not only be commended but we should all help them by participating in helping them by making purchases so that they are able to raise more and more funds for this important cause. If you do not live in Pakistan, you can still order, and have the items shipped to a relative or friend who lives in Pakistan, so that they do not have to spend money on shipping international.  If you would like make a purchase but do not have anyone in Pakistan to have your purchases shipped to, send me a message and we will arrange something for you.

May Allah protect and bless them and all who participate in this great project, and may Allah bless them with great success and help the unfortunate children who are suffering with a speedy recovery and may Allah give patience and strength to their parents and families. Ameen!

And be steadfast in prayer and regular in charity: And whatever good ye send forth for your souls before you, ye shall find it with Allah: for Allah sees Well all that ye do. (Surah Baqarah, Verse 110)

Share this article, and win a chance to win a jewelry item on behalf of Muslimah Today who will make the purchase for you to be donated to the Children’s Cancer Hospital in Karachi!

Check out some of their previous jewelry!

 

Share

By VIVIENNE WALT | Time.com

The Bab Amr district of Homs had already been descending into hell when the Syrian army apparently homed in on satellite phones being used by foreign journalists there and sent mortars their way, killing the American reporter Marie Colvin and the French photographer Rémi Ochlik on Feb. 22. It would take eight days before all their surviving colleagues were finally able to escape, even as Bab Amr lay shattered and grieving, its remaining residents — 4,000 people or so — exhausted by the weeks of bombardment, suffering from hunger and the gnawing cold. As of Thursday, Bab Amr was abandoned too by the elements of the Free Syrian Army who were using it to launch attacks on the regime of President Bashir Assad. The rebels had run out of ammunition. Syrian activists said on Thursday they had been forced to bury Colvin and Ochlik, after struggling for days to keep their bodies refrigerated with dwindling fuel supplies.

As Bab Amr was given over to the mercy of the Syrian army on Thursday, the French photographer William Daniels, on assignment for TIME, and the seriously injured French reporter Edith Bouvier, were led out of Syria in a perilous maneuver involving dozens of Syrian volunteers who were working with opposition activists — an operation that has focused attention on a New York City–based organization called Avaaz. Four days earlier, Colvin’s British colleague, photographer Paul Conroy, managed to escape into Lebanon through similar means. Javier Espinosa, a Spanish photographer trapped in Bab Amr, crossed the border into safety on Wednesday. Late Thursday night, Daniels sent text messages to TIME confirming he was in Lebanon and out of danger. “We are out,” he wrote. “And Edith is safe.”

 

Having smuggled themselves into Syria illicitly, the foreign journalists were trapped once the city became encircled by Assad’s forces. French diplomats failed to persuade Assad to allow an international evacuation team to extract the injured journalists. As the battle reached a crescendo this week, it was clear the journalists would have to make a run for it — or risk dying in the regime’s final offensive on the town. It has been a far from bloodless rescue. The Sunday operation that took Conroy out involved 35 Syrian volunteers, but the group was ambushed on its way out and 13 of the activists were killed, according to Avaaz. Conroy, Bouvier, Espinosa and Daniels were all part of the attempt, but in the chaos that ensued after the government forces attacked, the group split in two. Conroy was the only Western journalist to make it to Lebanon that day.

It has cost the Syrians dearly to try protect Western journalists. And yet, Avaaz’s director Ricken Patel told TIME in New York City that the Syrian activists, whom his organization supports with equipment and supplies, had expressed deep gratitude to the journalists for daring to travel to Homs. “They really are grateful for their bravery because these journalists are witnesses to this gigantic crime, of the shelling of Babr Amr,” Patel said, estimating that about 20 Syrians in total had died during the evacuations operations of the journalists. Over tea, Patel told me that about 50 Syrian activists working with Avaaz had volunteered to help evacuate the Western journalists.

 

The role of Avaaz in the Syrian uprising is startling and controversial. The activist organization, headquartered off Manhattan’s Union Square and run by the 35-year-old Canadian, was founded in 2007 to campaign on issues of corruption, poverty and climate change. It raised money and mobilized people through a mammoth online network that it says stretches across the world. Though based in New York City, its largest contingents are in Brazil and France, according to its officials. Its mission statement says it aims “to close the gap between the world we have and the world most people everywhere want.”

Then came Syria. As Avaaz activists grew alarmed by the near daily killings of civilians, the organization raised $1 million among members to begin smuggling quantities of medical equipment, video cameras and video-editing equipment into Homs and other beleaguered towns, using networks of unpaid Syrian activists on the ground. In recent weeks, it has also organized with Syrian activists to smuggle in 34 foreign journalists.

Avaaz had also smuggled similar equipment into Myanmar in 2007 and ’08. But Syria’s lethal firepower and closed borders presented far more dangerous challenges. Patel insists that Avaaz’s Syria campaign has worked well, pointing out the rich stream of video footage coming out the beleaguered country. “Whether we are the right people, when the crackdown came, no one was doing the communications support we were doing, getting satellite and video equipment into the country and training people,” he says. “If you speak to the BBC and al-Jazeera, it was fantastically successful.” As for the sacrifices and deaths of Syrians in Avaaz’s operation, Patel says, “I feel humbled by their staggering bravery.”

Injured French journalist Edith Bouvier speaks to the camera as she lies on a sofa in Homs in this still image taken from a video posted on a social media website. REUTERS/YouTube via Reuters TV

Injured British photographer Paul Conroy lies on a stretcher as he is treated by a doctor in Homs February 22, 2012 in this still image taken from a Reuters TV video February 24, 2012. Wounded foreign journalists trapped inside a besieged rebel-held neighbourhood in Syria on Thursday appealed for a ceasefire so they could be evacuated and receive proper medical care. French journalist Edith Bouvier and Conroy, a British photographer from the Sunday Times, made their plea by video as the sound of rocket fire echoed in the background. Conroy was injured on Wednesday in Baba Amro during a bombardment in which American journalist Marie Colvin and French photographer Remi Ochlik were killed, among with 80 more people that day. REUTERS/Reuters TV (SYRIA - Tags: POLITICS CIVIL UNREST MEDIA)

 

Injured French journalist Edith Bouvier speaks to the camera as she lies on a sofa in Homs in this still image taken from a video posted on a social media website. REUTERS/YouTube via Reuters TV

Injured French journalist Edith Bouvier speaks to the camera as she lies on a sofa in Homs in this still image taken from a video posted on a social media website. REUTERS/YouTube via Reuters TV

Share

Picture 1 – Al-Karam,  Pictures 2-11-Firdous,  Picture 12-Gul Ahmed, Pictures 13-15-Icon

423080_2447358523860_1848856538_1549119_490445690_n

Al-Karam

399902_2434190034656_1848856538_1544226_689592254_n

Firdous Lawn

401176_2434182434466_1848856538_1544214_1290358772_n

Firdous Lawn

407100_2434186514568_1848856538_1544220_1188082835_n

Firdous Lawn

407510_2434200234911_1848856538_1544248_680737077_n

Firdous Lawn

418304_2434184354514_1848856538_1544216_792058533_n

Firdous Lawn

419460_2434194954779_1848856538_1544237_2053699762_n

Firdous Lawn

420636_2434188474617_1848856538_1544224_1243484251_n

Firdous Lawn

422943_2434176794325_1848856538_1544204_1864523759_n

Firdous Lawn

422977_2434196074807_1848856538_1544239_213093272_n

Firdous Lawn

428591_2434199594895_1848856538_1544246_1510320405_n

Firdous Lawn

428745_10150550299747477_580657476_9331994_366323283_n

Gul Ahmed Lawn

395907_395243833825970_214689475214741_1827889_1324284810_n

Icon Lawn

422112_10150551679817477_580657476_9336677_155464756_n

Icon Lawn

429079_10150551669772477_580657476_9336620_1012595910_n

Icon Lawn

Al-KaramFirdous LawnFirdous LawnFirdous LawnFirdous LawnFirdous LawnFirdous LawnFirdous LawnFirdous LawnFirdous LawnFirdous LawnGul Ahmed LawnIcon LawnIcon LawnIcon Lawn
Share
 Page 1 of 2  1  2 »